mapa web 
     acquisitions and donations    |    publications    |    museum Library
home > services > publications > open forum > ophthalmology: transition
ophthalmology: transition

Why transition? Because I think I have lived through what I would define as the end of an era and the transition to our current times. The transition has consisted in coming from the multi-faceted ophthalmologist –the one practising the whole of the specialty: means for diagnosis, medical and/or surgical treatments- to the univalent ophthalmologist –who, keeping up with the ever-increasing complexity of the specialty, performs only a distinct part of ophthalmology.

I began in Ophthalmology by mid-20th century. The education received in the Faculty of Medicine regarding the subject for this specialty, was far from enough to consider myself able to practice it, even though the teacher, D. Mariano Soria, was an excellent ophthalmologist and knew how to teach. It was necessary, therefore, to broaden and practice the received knowledge under the supervision of a good teacher and within an institution allowing it. I was lucky that the Head of the Service of Ophthalmology of Santa Creu and Sant Pau’s Hospital was then an uncle of mine, Dr. F. Bordàs. He and his collaborators in the Service were my teachers. There, I acquired the required education to start practicing the specialty by early 1950s, until the period noted as the multi-faceted ophthalmologist’s. In fact, ophthalmology, established as a university discipline in the beginning of the 20th century, had become reduced to a theoretical and generalist subject, becoming necessary to round off through practical extra-university training. Once this theoretical and practical training had been completed, the ophthalmologist was better off to solve a variety of situations coming up in daily practice. Thus, it was necessary to do everything: sight recovery (sight testing, orthoptics, etc) diagnose with a terrifying shortage of means, medical treatments with an extremely reduced range of medicines, surgery often conditioned by the above mentioned problems for preliminary diagnosis as well as by yet poorly updated equipment.

The transition to the univalent ophthalmologist was due to the development of new technical instruments along the 1950s and the 1960s, such as: new diagnosis means –ElectroRetinoGram (ERG), Scanner, Retinal Angio-Fluoresceingraphy (AFGR)-, new pharmacological treatments –antibiotics, ocular hypotensors, etc-, improvements in surgical practice –cryosurgery, laser, etc- and new elements for sight recovery –precorneal lenses, intraocular lenses, etc. This complexity, due to technological changes, had exceeded the possibility for a single physician to undertake everything satisfactorily.

Thus, for the patients’ benefit, there are nowadays retina specialists, glaucoma specialists, etc, without detriment for these specialists’ knowledge of the whole discipline of ophthalmology. What is kept in the future for tomorrow’s ophthalmologists?

Dr. Enric Mateu Bordàs
Ophthalmologist


  © Official Medical Association of Barcelona     web design by MediTecnologia
  català    castellano